Speaking of project updates, I noticed that Rick has not posted anything in about 4 months. That combined with main page going down without any fixes, even a "Sorry, we are broken, join us in the forums in the meantime" message, seems grim.
Has anyone been in touch with him? Is it just a busy time ...
Search found 6 matches
- Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:29 am
- Forum: ArcticZone
- Topic: Project Status
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4115
- Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:24 pm
- Forum: ISV Search
- Topic: Available ISVs?
- Replies: 51
- Views: 35232
Warnings:
1. For most of this comment, I will pretend we are all based in the US and those are the only laws that matter.
2. I am quoting people and then responding, please understand that I am not responding to you, but to the comment in general. To put it another way, I may over explain something ...
1. For most of this comment, I will pretend we are all based in the US and those are the only laws that matter.
2. I am quoting people and then responding, please understand that I am not responding to you, but to the comment in general. To put it another way, I may over explain something ...
- Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:23 pm
- Forum: ArcticZone
- Topic: Project Status
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4115
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:26 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 8 packs for WG 3.2
- Replies: 27
- Views: 19928
Re: 8 packs for WG 3.2
I am pretty sure you are right actually. If that is the case then maybe once verified this thread should be unstickied and left for dead.dspain wrote: contacting my source now, but i do believe 3.2 just uses codes to control line counts, 3.0 was the last NT binary to use packs.
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 8 packs for WG 3.2
- Replies: 27
- Views: 19928
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:56 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 8 packs for WG 3.2
- Replies: 27
- Views: 19928